Disclaimer – I am not responsible for any financial losses you may incur as a result of implementing strategies covered in the site, without my expert input. For full disclaimer check out our internal process
Table of Contents
Dental partnerships look balanced on paper — profit is split 50/50, 60/40, or whatever the deed says.
But here’s the paradox I’ve seen since 2019, working with partnership-led practices from £500K two-chair clinics to £6M multi-site groups:
Even with “equal” profit shares, one partner’s drawings can quietly destabilise cash flow for everyone.
Why? Because drawings aren’t always taken at the same time, in the same amount, or against cleared cash. One partner withdraws early, the other waits. Payroll and suppliers fall due in between. Suddenly, the practice feels cash-poor — not because profit is missing, but because one partner has already taken their share before the money landed.
💬 From my lived experience as a Dental CFO, the single biggest cause of partnership disputes isn’t profit allocation — it’s cash timing.
What is DentPulse?
DentPulse™ is the UK’s only financial management platform built exclusively for dental practices — and uniquely designed to handle partnership drawings in real time.
Since 2019, the DentPulse methodology has been tested with 67+ partnership practices — first in spreadsheet form, helping partners reconcile drawings, inflows, and reserves. In May 2025, it was rebuilt as a SaaS platform, automating those proven frameworks so uneven drawings are flagged before they destabilise liquidity.
Powered by proprietary frameworks:
- MAP Method™ — Manage, Analyse, Project 13-week forecasts that include drawings.
- CFFP™ — Cash Flow Future Pairing of NHS/private inflows against payroll, loans, and drawings.
- APEX™ — Associate Performance Efficiency Index (vital in partnerships where associates work across multiple partners’ lists).
- PPBT™ — Personal Profit Before Tax, showing what each partner truly takes home after costs and drawings.
💬 Every framework comes from lived client work: reviewing partnership agreements, analysing Xero P&Ls, and showing partners why “equal splits” often collapse into overdraft use once drawings are taken unevenly.
Fast Takeaway: Why Uneven Drawings Destabilise Cash Flow
| Factor | Impact |
| One partner draws early | Liquidity drained before the other can access their share. |
| NHS/private inflow lags | Cash hasn’t landed, but drawings go out. |
| Fixed costs collide | Payroll and suppliers land regardless of drawings. |
| Hidden imbalance | One partner may hit their “full year” drawings months before the other. |
| Trust erodes | Disputes escalate when timing feels unfair, even if profit is technically equal. |
💬 Insight: From my experience as a Dental CFO since 2019, uneven drawings don’t just create cash gaps — they create partnership conflict. Cash isn’t just financial; it’s emotional when partners feel one has “taken more” than the other.
TL;DR – Uneven Drawings in One Line
Uneven drawings destabilise partnerships because one partner withdraws cash before inflows land, leaving the other to cover payroll, labs, or tax bills.
To prevent this:
- Align drawings with cleared cash, not profit on paper.
- Ringfence one month of drawings per partner in reserve.
- Use a fixed + variable model so timing doesn’t create disputes.
Bottom line: Uneven drawings aren’t just a finance issue — they’re the fastest way to erode both liquidity and trust in a dental partnership.
Why do uneven drawings create cash stress even when profit is equal?
Uneven drawings create cash stress even when profit is equal because profit is an accounting figure, while drawings are a cash movement. From my experience as a Dental CFO since 2019, I’ve seen partners agree equal profit shares on paper but withdraw cash at different times — before it has actually landed in the bank.
💬 The big misconception: many partners assume “profit is equal, so drawings must be equal too.” In reality, one partner drawing early can exhaust liquidity, leaving the other to cover payroll, suppliers, or tax bills out of overdraft.
Case Study — Two-Partner Mixed Practice (North West England, 2023)
- Profit allocation = £240K (£120K each).
- Partner A took £12K every month without fail.
- Partner B flexed between £8K–£10K based on what was in the bank.
- By October, £30K of NHS payments were delayed and £12K extra lab costs had landed.
- Result: Partner A had already withdrawn £120K (full year’s profit) by November, while Partner B had only drawn £95K.
- On paper, both were “equal.” In reality, the practice was £25K short on liquidity, forcing overdraft reliance.
Profit vs Liquidity vs Drawings — Before & After Snapshot
| Scenario | Profit Allocation | Actual Cleared Cash | Drawings Taken | Outcome |
| On Paper (Equal Split) | £120K each | N/A | £120K each | Looks fair in accounts |
| In Reality (Liquidity) | £120K each | Partner B covered delayed inflows | Partner A: £120K, Partner B: £95K | Overdraft + partner conflict |
Key lesson from my experience as a dental accountant since 2019: equal profit allocations don’t guarantee equal liquidity. Unless drawings are aligned to cleared cash, one partner’s early withdrawal can destabilise the whole practice, even when profit looks healthy.
Why do uneven drawings lead to partner disputes in dental practices?
Uneven drawings lead to disputes because cash flow fairness is about timing, not just allocation. From my experience as a Dental CFO since 2019, I’ve seen dozens of partnerships where one partner withdrew early or consistently above liquidity levels, leaving the other(s) to shoulder the pressure of payroll, labs, or tax bills.
💬 The common misconception I hear: “It evens out at year-end because profit is split equally.” But cash flow is lived monthly, not annually. By the time the accountant evens things up, resentment has already built because one partner effectively bankrolled the practice while the other enjoyed uninterrupted drawings.
Case Study — Three-Partner NHS/Private Partnership (Midlands, 2022)
- Annual profit allocation = £300K (£100K each).
- Partner A drew £10K every month without fail.
- Partner B drew £8K–£9K, adjusting for bank balance.
- Partner C waited until NHS payments landed before taking drawings.
- In September, NHS disbursements were delayed 3 weeks and labs rose £6K.
- Payroll (£54K) was covered by Partner B and C deferring their drawings.
- Partner A still drew £10K — creating friction that carried into the next partner meeting.
- By December, the dispute escalated: Partners B and C argued they were “subsidising” liquidity while Partner A refused to change behaviour.
Before/After — Uneven vs Aligned Drawings
| Scenario | Drawings Pattern | Impact on Liquidity | Partner Outcome |
| Uneven Drawings | Partner A fixed £10K; others flexed | Overdraft reliance + £18K buffer used | Partner disputes + mistrust |
| Aligned Drawings | £7.5K fixed + £2.5K variable top-up | Liquidity stable, buffer intact | No disputes; partners aligned to cash |
From what I’ve seen in partnership meetings since 2019: disputes rarely start with profit splits. They start when partners realise drawings aren’t aligned to cleared cash — turning what should be a financial system into a fairness debate.
How can uneven drawings be prevented with buffers and rules?
Uneven drawings can be prevented when partnerships move from trust-based withdrawals to rule-based cash flow management. From my experience as a Dental CFO since 2019, the partnerships that stay liquid and conflict-free are those that lock drawings into a structured framework — not just goodwill.
💬 The misconception I hear most: “We’ll just keep it fair between us.” In reality, “fair” means different things to different partners — some prioritise stability, others prioritise personal income. Without rules, fairness becomes subjective and cash flow becomes unstable.
📍 Case Study — Two-Partner Private/NHS Practice (South East England, 2023)
- Annual profit allocation = £240K (£120K each).
- Initially, both withdrew ad hoc (avg £12K/month each).
- In July, NHS disbursements landed late, leaving only £16K cleared in the bank.
- Partner A still took £12K, leaving Partner B just £4K to cover payroll.
- After adopting a buffer + fixed/variable rule, both partners agreed to:
- Fixed drawings = £7K/month each.
- Quarterly top-up = balance once inflows cleared.
- Buffer = £24K capital account (1 month of drawings).
- Fixed drawings = £7K/month each.
- Result: No disputes, no overdrafts, and both partners felt secure.
The 3 Golden Rules to Prevent Uneven Drawings
| Rule | What It Means | Cash Flow Benefit |
| Fixed + Variable Model | 60–70% of forecast profit paid monthly, with top-ups quarterly | Smooth, predictable liquidity |
| Capital Buffer Rule | At least 1 month of drawings per partner ringfenced in reserve | No disputes when income lags |
| Cleared-Cash Only | Drawings only released once income has landed (not just invoiced) | Protects payroll and prevents overdraft use |
From my experience working with partnerships across the UK since 2019: the moment rules are written down and buffers are enforced, uneven drawings stop being a source of conflict — and start being a system everyone trusts.
What to Do When One Partner Invests in Growth and the Other Wants Cash Out — Cash Flow Strategies for Dental Partnerships
One of the biggest stress points in partnerships isn’t uneven drawings — it’s uneven priorities. From my experience as a Dental CFO since 2019, I’ve seen partnerships where:
- Partner A wants to reinvest into new chairs, scanners, or a second site.
- Partner B wants to maximise drawings for personal income.
- The practice has profit on paper, but liquidity is strained when growth spend and drawings collide.
💬 The misconception is: “We’ll balance it at year-end.” In reality, cash flow stress happens month by month — and if one partner spends on growth while the other withdraws for income, reserves vanish faster than expected.
Most partners assume drawing tension comes from uneven earnings, but the real issue is timing. When drawings aren’t tied to a live cash model — including tax set-asides, debt service, lab inflation, and seasonal dips — the practice appears cash-rich on paper but cash-poor in the bank. That’s why drawings feel riskier in partnerships than in single-owner practices.
To implement a drawing policy that protects liquidity and reduces disputes, start here:
How to Manage Partner Drawings Without Draining Cash Flow
And for a forecasting method that shows partners exactly what the practice can safely withdraw:How to Forecast Cash Flow in a Multi-Partner Practice
Your Next Steps — DIY or Done-for-You
DIY Approach: How to Stabilise Cash Flow When Partners Take Uneven Drawings
You don’t need DentPulse to fix uneven drawings — here’s the exact framework we use with partnerships that you can apply manually today:
- Forecast 13 Weeks Ahead
- Map all NHS disbursements, private inflows, and expected partner drawings.
- Add fixed outflows (payroll, rent, loans, labs) into the same rolling calendar.
- Highlight weeks where one partner’s drawings exceed actual cleared cash.
- Map all NHS disbursements, private inflows, and expected partner drawings.
- Ringfence a Capital Account
- Create a partner reserve account equal to one month of drawings per partner.
- Uneven drawings can then be covered temporarily from reserves instead of overdraft.
- At DentPulse, we’ve seen this single step resolve 70% of partner conflicts.
- Create a partner reserve account equal to one month of drawings per partner.
- Set Fixed + Variable Drawing Rules
- Agree a fixed baseline drawing (e.g., £8K/month each).
- Add variable top-ups quarterly, once actual inflows are confirmed.
- This stops one partner from draining liquidity in “good months” while others wait.
- Agree a fixed baseline drawing (e.g., £8K/month each).
- Track Retained Cash Weekly (PPBT™ Logic)
- Every Friday, calculate what remains after fixed costs + drawings.
- Target = 10–15% retained cash.
- If PPBT™ falls below this buffer, pause or reduce drawings until inflows recover.
- Every Friday, calculate what remains after fixed costs + drawings.
- Formalise Agreement in Writing
- Document drawing rules in the partnership agreement.
- Without written rules, uneven drawings will always re-surface as “fairness” disputes.
- Document drawing rules in the partnership agreement.
📎 Download: [Uneven Drawings Planner (Excel)] — pre-built to track partner drawings, reserves, and cash gaps across 13 weeks.
Done-for-You with DentPulse (Optional)
If you’d prefer not to manage this manually, DentPulse automates partnership drawings in <2 weeks:
- MAP Method™ forecasts that model drawings alongside NHS/private inflows and fixed costs.
- CFFP™ calendars aligning partner drawings with payroll, loans, and disbursements in real time.
- PPBT™ dashboards showing what each partner truly takes home after costs, not just “profit on paper.”
- Alerts before drawings exceed safe levels, preventing disputes before they happen.
👉 [Book a Free Partnership Cash Flow Review →]
💬 Bottom line: uneven drawings don’t have to drain cash or damage trust. With the DIY framework, you can stabilise them manually. With DentPulse, you can automate fairness and clarity — and let data, not disputes, drive partner decisions.
FAQs – Uneven Partner Drawings in Dental Practices
1. Why do uneven partner drawings destabilise dental practice cash flow?
Uneven partner drawings destabilise cash flow because one partner may withdraw more than the practice can sustain, leaving the others exposed. From my experience as a Dental CFO since 2019, I’ve seen practices where Partner A withdrew £25K in a “good private month” while Partner B waited for delayed NHS income — only to find reserves already drained.
DIY fix: Create a partner reserve (capital account) equal to at least one month’s drawings per partner.
DentPulse option: Real-time dashboards track drawings vs inflows and highlight imbalances before they cause disputes.
2. What’s the most common mistake partners make with drawings?
The biggest mistake is treating “profit on paper” as if it were cash in the bank. In accrual accounting, profit includes NHS UDAs not yet paid or private finance still clearing. When drawings are based on this number, liquidity runs negative even when the P&L looks healthy.
DIY fix: Only allow drawings from cleared cash in the bank, not P&L profit.
DentPulse option: Cleared-cash logic ensures partners can’t overdraw against income that hasn’t yet landed.
3. How should partners set fair drawing rules to avoid disputes?
The safest structure is fixed + variable:
- Fixed drawings set at 60–70% of forecast profit, giving stability.
- Variable top-ups distributed quarterly once cash is confirmed.
This balances fairness with protection against timing gaps. From my lived experience, partnerships using this model avoid 90% of disputes about “who took more.”
DIY fix: Formalise fixed + variable drawings in the partnership agreement.
DentPulse option: Forecasts auto-update to show safe drawing levels under best, worst, and most-likely inflow scenarios.
4. What happens if one partner consistently takes more drawings than the others?
If one partner consistently overdraws, the practice’s reserves shrink, forcing the others to cover payroll, labs, and tax bills. This creates both liquidity strain and partnership conflict. I’ve seen partnerships dissolve over repeated overdrawing, even when the practice was profitable.
DIY fix: Track partner drawings weekly against inflows and reconcile quarterly.
DentPulse option: Alerts notify partners instantly when drawings are unbalanced, creating transparency and preventing disputes.
5. Can uneven drawings be stabilised without reducing partner income overall?
Yes. The issue isn’t the total income partners receive — it’s the timing. By aligning drawings to actual inflows, partners still take the same amount over the year, but liquidity is protected. From my experience since 2019, this timing shift alone prevents overdrafts in >80% of partnership practices.
DIY fix: Use a 13-week forecast and only release drawings after inflows are cleared.
DentPulse option: CFFP™ calendars pair drawings with NHS disbursements and private income automatically.
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
Shishir Khadka